Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jimmy Yang vs Maximus Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yang vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Jimmy Yang vs Maximus Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Yang 1 - 0 Jones
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yang has won 44.53% of points on their second serve, while Jones has won 48.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yang, in recent form, has won 44.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 45.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.65% and 30.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yang has saved 52.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 58.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yang has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Jones winning 57.41% (W/L 31/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Jones has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 71/ 66), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Yang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 18/ 26), where as Jones has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yang winning 1 times and Jones being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Yang winning 2 and Jones winning 1. The last match between Yang and Jones was at the M25 Baotou, 29-05-2024, First, Clay with Jimmy Yang getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yang and Jones have played a deciding set 1 times, with Yang winning 1 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Yang winning 1, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yang has played against opponents with an average rank of 131.73 while Jones has played against players with an average rank of 120.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yang has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yang has converted 37.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 43.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
789
Rank
709
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
579
Rank
544
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
47% (75-86)
Career Total W/L
49% (83-86)
30% (6-14)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jimmy Yang vs Maximus Jones For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Yang VS Jones
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jimmy Yang | Maximus Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:25:0 | 3:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (56/109) | 51% (57/112) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (40/56) | 70% (40/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (29/53) | 55% (30/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (42/112) | 37% (40/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Jimmy Yang
Player
Maximus Jones
51%
(
56 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
10
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jimmy Yang | Maximus Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 30% (6/14) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (15/31) | 46% (24/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (196/251) | 49% (241/250) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) | 53% (9/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 101 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:21 | 1:48:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 74.95 | 91.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (650/1162) | 67% (1002/1500) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (457/650) | 69% (689/1002) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (228/512) | 49% (242/498) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (30/81) | 44% (53/121) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (412/1188) | 36% (520/1429) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 30% (6/14) | 44% (7/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 30% (6/20) | 43% (9/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Jimmy Yang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Jimmy Yang
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Yuquan Jin
46%
(
38 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
9
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
8
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuquan Jin
Player
Jimmy Yang
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Maximus Jones
51%
(
56 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
10
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Woobin Shin
Player
Jimmy Yang
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
25 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Jimmy Yang
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
3
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Jimmy Yang
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Jimmy Yang
40%
(
23 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Jimmy Yang
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Maximus Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Maximus Jones
51%
(
56 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
10
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nico Hornitschek
Player
Maximus Jones
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
65 of
88)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
32 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
38 of
122)
118
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Maximus Jones
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kane Bonsach Ganley
Player
Maximus Jones
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
Player
Maximus Jones
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
48
|
3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Bruno Pujol Navarro
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
123)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
118
Total Points Won
122
|
5-7 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Maximus Jones
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
13
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Natthayut Nithithananont
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Yi Zhou
80%
(
85 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
view more
Yang Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Yang are available here and Jones photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
